How do we navigate an open-ended classroom, with students working collaboratively while at the same time accurately assessing individual understanding? This is one of the primary challenges teachers face when making changes to their practice and adopting new techniques.
We want students to be driven by their innate curiosity and interests, but how can we chart this evenly across the entire roster of our class?
This simple question forces us to look into our philosophy on assessment. What is the purpose of assessment and how is it being used in our classes? With a shift towards understanding, over coverage, our assessments need to chart understanding and not simply give an evaluative snapshot. Let’s take a look at ongoing assessment. Continue reading “Tips for Teaching for Understanding: Ongoing Assessment”
Previously, we summarized what Understanding Goals are and their placement within the Teaching for Understanding framework. Let’s take a look at Understanding Performances to see how they relate.
The major difference between understanding goals (UGs) and understanding performances (UPs) is UGs state what students should understand while UPs are what students do to demonstrate their understanding. Continue reading “Tips for Teaching For Understanding: Understanding Performances”
According to The Teaching for Understanding Guide, there are four components to the framework:
- Generative Topics
- Understanding Goals
- Performances of Understanding
- Ongoing Assessment
We looked at Generative Topics here and that would be a great place to start if you are considering retooling your practice. Here, we are going to take a look at Understanding Goals and how they can be implemented. Continue reading “Tips for Teaching For Understanding: Understanding Goals”